The Founding Fathers, the Electoral College and the Insanity of the Department of Justice
The quest to determine Obama’s eligibility has seen the Department of Justice resort to our Founding Fathers. In their motion to dismiss they state,
The Constitution’s commitment to the Electoral College of the responsibility to select the President includes the authority to decide whether a presidential candidate is qualified for office because the examination of a candidate’s qualifications is an integral component of the electors’ decision-making process.
Explaining this provision of the Constitution, Alexander Hamilton stated that: “the people of each State shall choose a number of persons as electors, equal to the number of senators and representatives of such State in the national government who shall assemble within the State, and vote for some fit person as President.” [emphasis added]. See Federalist Papers, No. 68.
If this is true then why hasn’t the Department of Justice sought “federal” election law violations in 26 States and the District of Columbia that mandate that the electors vote not for someone who is “fit” to be President, but vote for the person who wins the popular vote?
What is more disturbing is that this particular group has a sufficient number of electors to place into office a person who they are prohibited by law to determine if this person is fit or not.
26 States and the
Party Pledge / State Law - § 17-19-2
Party Pledge / State Law - § 15.30.040; 15.30.070
State Law - § 6906
State Law - § 1-4-304
State Law § 9-175
DC Pledge / DC Law - § 1-1312(g)
Party Pledge / State Law - § 103.021(1)
State Law - §§ 14-26 to 14-28
State Law - § 805
State Law - § 20-4
Party Pledge / State Law -
State Law - §168.47 (Violation cancels vote and elector is replaced).
Party Pledge / State Law - §23-15-785(3)
State Law - §13-25-104
State Law - § 32-714
State Law - § 298.050
State Law - § 1-15-5 to 1-15-9 (Violation is a fourth degree felony.)
State Law - § 163-212 (Violation cancels vote; elector is replaced and is subject to $500 fine.)
State Law - § 3505.40
State Pledge / State Law - 26, §§ 10-102; 10-109 (Violation of oath is a misdemeanor, carrying a fine of up to $1000.)
State Pledge / State Law - § 248.355
State Pledge / State Law - § 7-19-80 (Replacement and criminal sanctions for violation.)
State Law - title 17, § 2732
State Law - § 24.1-162
Party Pledge / State Law - §§ 29.71.020, 29.71.040, Supp. ($1000 fine.)
State Law - § 7.75
State Law - §§ 22-19-106; 22-19-108
From the list above and the total number of electoral votes being more than what is necessary to elect a President with out the electors having an opportunity to examine the qualifications of the candidate then what the Department of Justice is saying is nonsense.
But in the same Federalist Paper number 68
Nothing was more to be desired than
that every practicable obstacle should be opposed to cabal, intrigue, and
corruption. These most deadly adversaries of republican government might
naturally have been expected to make their approaches from more than one querter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to
gain an improper ascendant in our councils. How could they better gratify this,
than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the
Talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity, may alone suffice to elevate a man to the first honors in a single State; but it will require other talents, and a different kind of merit, to establish him in the esteem and confidence of the whole Union, or of so considerable a portion of it as would be necessary to make him a successful candidate for the distinguished office of President of the United States.
But today with the MSM being owned
and controlled by corporate groups, all of which are owned in part by foreign interests,
the need for a free body of electors who swear to insure that any candidate
they cast their vote for is qualified.
The truth is that during the election there was no mass media coverage at all about Obama’s questionable constitutional eligibility. So even those free electors in the 24 states whose vote is not mandated by law we intentionally kept in the dark.
24 States with 257 Electoral votes where the Electors are free to follow Founding Fathers advice
ARIZONA - 10 Electoral Votes
MISSOURI - 11 Electoral Votes
Even with these free electors, the election laws of the several states favor the unconstitutional political parties. Yes, you heard me correctly political parties are unconstitutional. The Founding Fathers knew about them and refused to recognize them in the Constitution. They warned us about them but they refused to make them a codified part of our national government.
When the laws of the states forbid the electors to use their best judgment on selecting a President, when the mass media has been taken over by foreign interests and keeps those free electors in the dark, and when the states allow blocks of electors to run under party banners that is at odds with the intentions of the Founding Fathers it not only becomes disingenuous of the Department of Justice to try and use the words of the Founders to keep a person whose qualifications have been questioned by the Supreme Court, but makes them complicit in treason.
Eric Holder said, "Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial, we have always been and we -- I believe continue to be in too many ways essentially a nation of cowards," well we can see now that he and his boss are the biggest coward of them all.
To think that in America today it takes the full force of the United States justice system, with the complicity of mass media to hide from the American people a simple little truth, is Obama constitutionally qualified to be President or not.
Is this a question of affirmative action? Can’t the first man of color put to rest these questions once and for all or does he need the coercive force of the government to support his unsubstantiated claim of being a natural born citizen.
I think that
I do fear for my country, I fear because honest debate has been stifled by over priced lawyers and pretty puff personalities who nightly tell lies on our televisions. I fear because the vast once silent majority has awakened and found that both the government and the once free press wants them to shut up. I fear when I do not hear these patriots because I know that a rage is building inside of them, a rage that will not be stifled, but one that will explode upon the political landscape. I am afraid that those in power have long since concerned themselves with anything other then themselves that these cowards in office may set in motion events that bear eerie similarities to what the British done to start the first revolution.