Where in the World,

Was Obama Born?

 

The question of Barrack Hussein Obama, II’s actual location of birth is of great concern. Until he releases his vault copy, of the long form birth certificate and supporting evidence such as the hospital records, this issue will haunt him for his entire term in office.

 

Kenya?

 

Was Barrack Hussein Obama, II born in Kenya as his paternal grandmother stated? Given the evidence it seems plausible, especially since the people involved were asked very pointed questions, as so not to confuse the birth of Barrack Hussein Obama II with that of the birth of his father. If Barrack Hussein Obama II, was born in Kenya, he is not a citizen of the United States. The law of the United States that governed the births of children of US Citizens in 1961, probated his mother from giving him US citizenship. 

 

It appears there is as of August 2, 2009 am authentic copy of a Kenyan birth certificate. The full story is here.  

 

(Click to Enlarge)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hawaii?

 

It appears that two long form “Certificates of Live Birth” were discovered from the state of Hawaii for two twins born the day after Obama with lower certificate numbers then his. Read the story here.  

 

A real Certificate of Live Birth from August 5, 1961 appears here.

(Click to Enlarge)

 

 

From his own website, his own family and officials of the Kenyan government, we have many conflicting reports, Obama’s Website says that he was born in one Hawaiian hospital, while his half-sister says he was born in another. 

According to the FreeRepublic who made calls to all the hospitals in the vicinity of Honolulu, Hawaii, none have said that there are records for Obama’s birth.

KenyaHawaii?

There are reports that indicate that he was born in the Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa, Kenya. So the question becomes how could he have a Hawaiian birth certificate?   

Depending on what his long copy vault birth certificate states, this may or may not deepen the problem. If it states either of the two hospitals and the hospital records prove that he was in fact born in one of the Hawaiian Hospitals, then the location of his birth will definitely prove he is entitled to be a US Citizen in accordance to the 14th Amendment. This of course does not necessarily give him the necessary status of a natural born citizen.

If his long form birth certificate states he was born at home, then this in itself does not prove that he was born, and in fact could lead to greater problems. People like to point to an announcement in the Hawaiian weekly newspaper ““The Sunday Advertiser” on August 13, 1961 which reads,

Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., Son, Aug. 4.

An independent investigation to determine if the Obama’s were in fact residents turn up no proof that they were, and in fact created more doubt when a neighbor who lived there since before that date, stated she remembered the family living at Waikiki, which is 8 miles away, did not remember them living on Kalanianaole Hwy.

Why this fact can cast further doubt over Obama’s legitimacy to hold the office of President of the United States is because the Hawaiian law regarding Certificates of Live Birth (courtesy of the FreeRepublic) makes them unreliable not only to prove natural born citizenship, but native citizenship as well.

From Hawaii’s official Department of Health, Vital Records webpage: “Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country“ (applies to adopted children). 

A.     A parent may register an in-state birth in lieu of certification by a hospital of birth under HRS 338-5.

B.      Hawaiian law expressly provides for registration of out-of-state births under HRS 338-17.8. 

A foreign birth presumably would have been recorded by the American consular of the country of birth, and presumably that would be reflected on the Hawaiian birth certificate.

C.     Hawaiian law, however, expressly acknowledges that its system is subject to error.  See, for example, HRS 338-17.

D.    Hawaiian law expressly provides for verification in lieu of certified copy of a birth certificate under HRS 338-14.3.

E.      Even the Hawaii Department of Home Lands does not accept a certified copy of a birth certificate as conclusive evidence for its homestead program.  From its web site:  “In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.”

Please Note: The above mentioned law HRS 338-17.8 did not go into effect until 1972. The Birthers are now going to let the American public see the actual law that Hawaii operated under on August 4, 1961. It was the territorial ACT 96, which is reproduced below in its entirety.

AN ACT

To Provide For The Issuance Of Certificates Of Hawaiian Birth.

Be it Enacted by the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii:

ACT 96.

AN ACT

To PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF HAWAIIAN BIRTH.

Be it Enacted by the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii:

SECTION 1. The Secretary of Hawaii may, whenever satisfied that any person was born within the Hawaiian Islands, cause to be issued to such person a certificate showing such fact. The Secretary, with the approval of the Governor, may make such regulations respecting the form of application and certificates, the method of proof, kind of evidence, and time, place and manner of hearing, and all other matters and circumstances connected with such application, proof and hearing as to him may appear necessary, and such regulations, when so approved and published once a week for three successive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation published in the Territory, shall have the force of law, and such publication shall be deemed legal notice to all persons. The Secretary may furnish the form of such applications and certificates. All applications shall be by sworn petition, in which the party shall set forth circumstantially all the facts upon which his application rests, and shall be accompanied by sworn affidavits of witnesses. The Secretary and such persons as he may designate and appoint may examine, under oath, any applicant or person cognizant of the facts regarding any application and for that purpose he and they are hereby authorized and empowered to administer oaths, subpoena and compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of books and papers, punish for contempts and, generally, to exercise the same authority with regard to their special jurisdiction as is by law conferred on District Magistrates.

SECTION 2. Any applicant or any person, who shall give or offer any false testimony, oral or written, under oath, in support or respect of any application for a certificate under the provisions of the foregoing Section, shall be deemed guilty of perjury and shall be punishable accordingly.

SECTION 3. Any certificate of Hawaiian Birth heretofore issued under or by virtue of any law of the Territory, or which may be issued in conformity with the provisions of this Act, shall be prima facie evidence of the facts therein stated.

SECTION 4. A fee of Five Dollars ($5.00) shall be charged by the Secretary before issuing any such certificate; all such fees received shall be paid by the Secretary, to the Treasurer of the Territory, as a government realization.

SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect from and after the date of its approval.

Approved this 17th day of April, A. D. 1911.

WALTEK F. FKEAR, Governor of the Territory of Hawaii.

As you can see in Article I, during the time of Obama’s birth, Hawaii had no laws requiring a out of state birth certificate to be presented. In fact all that was required was for his mother, and another person to swear that he was in fact born in Hawaii. Considering the overwhelming evidence of the statement of his paternal grandmother, saying he was born in Kenya, it is for this reason Barrack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate be unsealed and examined openly by the body public under the conditions of forensic document experts. It is possible that one person could have lied and another would have sworn to it. With Barrack Hussein Obama, II refusal to open his past to transparent examination, this possibility is going to become more of a probability in the minds of Americans.    

Under this “territorial law,” all what would be needed is a sworn statement attesting to his birth. Which leaves open the possibility that Barak Hussein Obama, II was born in Kenya. Without a witness to his birth, there is absolutely no way in which a natural born citizen status can be proved.

 

We are not saying that his mother conspired to conceal his actual birthplace, knowing that one day her son would run for President.  It could be much more human, we are saying that Barack Hussein Obama, II has proven that he is a pathological liar, and an opportunist. He seen an opportunity and went for it, even if he knew what he was doing was against the law and traditions of the United States of America.